Available IPI Books

Saturday, March 5, 2011

Antonetti Deserves the Benefit of the Doubt

(Photo: AP)
Isn’t the old axiom good pitching beats good hitting?
Just a question considering the Cleveland Indians recently traded pitcher Aaron Laffey for hitter Matt Lawson.
Sure Laffey is not considered a “good” pitcher by any means.  And what kind of player is Lawson?  Most experts will say he is a fringe prospect at best; organizational filler. 
So, shouldn’t average to below average pitching still be able to beat average to below average hitting?  Shouldn’t Laffey, who still has a minor league option left, who has had some success as a Major League starter and reliever, have more value to the Indians organization than Lawson? 
Perhaps Laffey is more valuable, if you go by conventional wisdom and outside opinions. 
But to hear Tribe General Manager Chris Antonetti tell it, the Indians did not feel Laffey had a place in the starting rotation or bullpen this year.  On the other hand, because of his makeup they feel Lawson has a chance to make the big leagues at some point.  Despite what others may think.
And it is, afterall, now Antonetti’s team.  And in this, his first year as General Manager, he deserves the right to make the team over as he sees fit.  As for the pundits who think this is just the Indians doing business as usual, lets give Antonetti a little leeway to make his own mark on the industry.
The failure of the Indians to develop a strong organization over the last couple of years happened on Mark Shapiro’s watch.  The recent turn around of the farm system also began on Shapiro’s watch.  Yes, Antonetti was on the staff, but he did not pull any triggers.  Shapiro may still be in the organization, but this organization is going to be made over to reflect Antonetti’s vision; he is nobody’s lap dog.  The St. Louis Cardinals, one of the best run organizations in all of baseball, would not have been interested in Antonetti as their General Manager a couple of years ago had they believed him capable to be nothing more than Shapiro’s puppet.
Maybe Antonetti and his staff see something in Lawson that others don’t.  Maybe he’s just an Antonetti’s kind of guy and along the same lines of Travis Buck, Nick Johnson, Orlando Cabrera, and Chad Durbin.
One, or two, or all of those players might prove to be a prudent signing.  Or not.  There’s just no way to tell as of yet.  But Antonetti has been trained by Shapiro, a General Manager who will be judged by history much better than his current reputation would suggest.  Antonetti has been recruited by other clubs to be their top man, including one of the best organizations in all of the sport.  And Larry Dolan is putting more money in player development than the Indians have ever done before.

Doesn’t Antonetti deserve the benefit of the doubt his first year?  Let’s let him remake this organization in his image, give him a year or two, and then let’s debate the wisdom of all his player moves.

3 comments:

Yes, Chris Antonetti deserves the benefit of the doubt, but should not be void of some responsiblity for the organizations performance over the last few seasons as he was also part of it. Similar to the accolades draped over Alex Anthopolous but none of the blame for Toronto's struggles while he was second in command under Riccardi.

The only problem I have is that "Dolan is putting more money in player development than the Indians ever have before". I've read multiple statements from those who supposedly know the organization that the Indians were annually among the top spenders on player development.

Yeah, will be interesting to see what stamp Antonetti puts on the team. He's worked under Shapiro as his right hand man for years and many people think he is a clone and things will be the same. Then again people thought the same when Shapiro took over for Hart as Shapiro worked under Hart for years and they worked the same and people thought he would be a clone....and things were very different. Will be interesting to see if a different style emerges.

Art, I can't speak for Greg, but I took that line about putting money into player development as their increased scouting budget of late. They were #1 in draft spending last year. You are correct in that they are always usually one of the top ten teams as far as the overall scouting budget goes, but I think what Greg is getting at is how we are sinking more money into the draft.

Post a Comment