Clipper bats power way to win
The Clippers got off to an early 5-0 lead to start the game with Josh Barfield, David Dellucci, Matt LaPorta, Andy Marte, and Stephen Head each picking up hits in the first inning.
In the third, Louisville fought back to score three via an RBI double and a two-run home run.
In the bottom half of the fouth, the Clippers stole the three runs back by a Wilson Valdez bunt single, Josh Barfield and David Delucci single and a Wes Hodges double, scoring three.
Wyatt Toregas would hit his first of two home runs on the day in the bottom half of the sixth and his other coming in the seventh.
Kirk Saarloos (1-2) went six innings surrendering 12 hits on four runs. He also walked three while striking out four. Scott Roehl would pitch the final three innings, earning a rare three inning save.
Josh Barfield, David Dellucci, and Wyatt Toregas each contributed two hits on the day, while Matt LaPorta knocked three hits and Wes Hodges drove in three leading the way to a Clippers 14-4 victory over Louisville.
Akron pitching leads to two wins
In Game 1 of the doubleheader, the game was scoreless until the top of the sixth inning when a wild pitch and a steal put Jose Constanza on third with two down. Constanza would score on a base hit to left field by Beau Mills.
Akron would strike again in the top of the seventh when a walk and an error put two runners on for Jerad Head who would drive in Niuman Romero to give them a 2-0 lead.
That's all they would need as Hector Rondon (3-0) pitched five scoreless innings allowing only four hits of the game for Harrisburg and striking out two. Erik Stiller would come on in the sixth shutting the door, only surrendering one walk. Vinnie Pestano would pitch a perfect seventh earning his sixth save, giving Akron a 2-0 win in Game 1.
Harrisburg jumped out first in Game 2, who would score a run in the bottom half of the second inning.
Akron would quickly jump back in the third when Josh Rodriguez would single in Jerad Head and Carlos Rivera would double in Rodriguz, giving Akron a 2-1 lead. Frank Herrmann (1-1) would allow another run in the bottom half on the inning, knotting the score up at two.
Damaso Espino would single in Niuman Romero in the top of the seventh, giving Akron a 3-2 lead and the win.
Herrmann went four innings, allowing two runs via the long ball and Carlton Smith (1-0) went the rest of the way, earning his first victory of the season.
K-Tribe falls short in late innings
The K-Tribe would take an early 1-0 lead in the first when Tim Fedroff lead off the game with a walk and later in the inning, Lonnie Chisenhall doubled to score Fedroff. However, that lead would not last long as Myrtle Beach would tag Zach Putnam (2-0) for seven runs.
Putnam would rebound pitching four scoreless innings, only allowing two hits and striking out four.
In the fourth, Kinston would hit two straight doubles to start the inning via Lucas Montero and Richard Martinez and would later have a sacrifice fly off the bat of Tim Fedroff to score Martinez.
Then in the sixth, Adam Davis would reach on an error and Tim Fedroff and Cord Phelps would each walk. With no outs, Lonnie Chisenhall would step to the plate and hit his second grand slam in the past two games to cap his two-for-five, five RBI day. Matt McBride would then reach on another error and Lucas Montero would drive him in, giving Kinston an 8-7 lead.
However, in the bottom half on the seventh, Myrtle Beach would strike for two runs, giving them a 9-8 lead in which they would eventually win by. Both runs were unearned off an error by Chisenhall.
Jonathan Holt (1-1) would take the loss.
Cord Phelps had a two-for-four day, including a double. Lucas Montero went three-for-four with two doubles and Lonnie Chisenhall has a remarkable ten RBI's in the past two games, including two home runs.
Captains have rally sink late
Lake County would score a run in each of the first three innings with Abner Abreu and Chris Nash each driving in one and the other run coming via an error.
The Blue Claws would score four in the bottom half of the third and another two in the seventh.
The Captains would mount a comeback in the ninth when Chris Nash began the inning with a walk. Ryan Blair would then single, putting two runners on with no outs. They each would then advance on a pass ball, putting both in scoring position. Adam Abraham would ground out to short, but would score Nash. Walter Diaz would also ground out, scoring Blair. However, Donnie Webb would be called out on strikes, leaving the Captains just short and losing to Lakewood 6-5.
T.J. House (0-1) would take the loss.
9 comments:
Tony, I beg you to speak to "Zaj" (whoever he/she is) and tell him/her to stop misusing the quasi-conditional auxiliary verb, "would," in summarizing the events of games. Please require Zaj to join thousands of other sports reporters in using the simple past tense, instead of the incredibly irritating quasi-conditional.
In this one blog post, Zaj started to use the normal past tense ["The Clippers got off to an early 5-0 lead ... In the third, Louisville fought back ... In the bottom half of the fouth, the Clippers stole the three runs back ...]. But then Zaj switched to the quasi-conditional ("would") and proceeded to use it, over and over and over again, occasionally switching back to the past tense -- and thus producing jarring, obnoxious contrasts for us readers:
Here are Zaj's THIRTY-SEVEN misuses of the word, "would":
"Wyatt Toregas would hit ..."
"Scott Roehl would pitch ..."
"Akron would strike again ..."
"... for Jerad Head who would drive in Niuman Romero ..."
"That's all they would need ..."
"Erik Stiller would come on ..."
"Vinnie Pestano would pitch ..."
"Harrisburg jumped out first in Game 2, who would score a run ..."
"Akron would quickly jump back in the third when Josh Rodriguez would single in Jerad Head and Carlos Rivera would double in Rodriguz ..."
"Frank Herrmann (1-1) would allow another run ..."
"Damaso Espino would single in Niuman Romero ..."
"The K-Tribe would take an early 1-0 lead ..."
"However, that lead would not last long as Myrtle Beach would tag ..."
"Putnam would rebound ..."
"In the fourth, Kinston would hit ... and would later have a sacrifice fly ..."
"Then in the sixth, Adam Davis would reach on an error and Tim Fedroff and Cord Phelps would each walk."
"... Lonnie Chisenhall would step to the plate ..."
"Matt McBride would then reach ... and Lucas Montero would drive him in..."
"... Myrtle Beach would strike ... giving them a 9-8 lead in which they would eventually win by." [WHAT???]
"Jonathan Holt (1-1) would take the loss."
"Lake County would score a run ..."
"The Blue Claws would score ..."
"The Captains would mount ..."
"Ryan Blair would then single ..."
"They each would then advance ...
"Adam Abraham would ground out to short, but would score Nash."
"Walter Diaz would also ground out..."
"... Donnie Webb would be called out on strikes ..."
"T.J. House (0-1) would take the loss."
Thank you for taking care of this, thereby making a major improvement to an otherwise excellent blog.
John in Lorain
I have to admit, I think John in Lorain had a rough morning.
Some good stuff happening yesterday,and some bad.
Nice to see LaPorta doesn't have to live by the long ball, and can in fact have a good day without it.
K-Tribe is my current fave affiliate, Lonnie C. is kickin butt, Cord Phelps is en fuego after a truly execrable fist week, Matt Brown: Damn!
TJ House with a disappointing effort. He could have been out of the big inning with no damage if Karexon Sanchez hadn't made yet another error, but he(House) needs to learn to deal with adversity.
Smith and Rondon with good work in Akron. Haven't been paying attention to Carleton, nice game for him.
Damn John. I appreciate the feedback, but being that this was Zaj's first post let's give him a chance to settle in a little. I agree there are some things he (and I) could do better from a writing aspect, but speaking only for myself it should be noted I have ZERO journalistic training as I am learning all of this stuff on the fly. So, patience my man, we'll get this stuff ironed out!:-)
John,
Apparently you have a lot of extra time on your hands to count 37 times. However, I do appreciate the constructive criticism, as it will help to improve the writing.
However, to attack it the way you did was a bit out of line.
As stated, this was my first post and it was also late. Please be patient.
Thanks,
Zaj
I'm still trying to figure out what the hell a "quasi-conditional auxiliary verb" is.:-)
Tony and Zaj,
There was no way for me to know that this was Zaj's first post. I don't see, however, why you both seem to be using that as an excuse. You guys are adult men (or at least in your late teens), and you have been writing (for school) for many years. We are talking about very ordinary stuff here, not "rocket science."
Thanks for saying, though, that you will do better. It will be appreciated. The content ("stuff") of your posts is excellent, and it cannot be obtained anywhere else. Now only the "form" of the posts need to be pleasing too.
John in Lorain
PS to Jake Taylor: I didn't have a "bad morning." You probably jumped to that wrong conclusion because, unlike me, you have been "educated" by teachers that didn't care enough to require you to write with proper spelling, grammar, and "style." When I was educated (1950s and '60s), teachers really cared. Now I have a mission to help the younger generations to care too.
Sorry, John in Lorain, I guess I should have said you have way too much time on your hands to be so diligent and persistent on attacking grammatical styles of a blog post, rather than just soaking in the information necessary.
You're coming off as very pompous, rather than being constructive. Congratulations for being my elder, but that doesn't give you any reason to talk down to "our" generation.
You realize that, in your mind, these are mostly "kids" posting about these prospects (or... kids), right?
Post a Comment